The 5-Step Product Positioning Playbook for Product Marketers
- 6 days ago
- 11 min read
I've spent years running positioning workshops and training PMMs across companies of all sizes. Before each session, I ask these teams to rate their current positioning process on a scale of 1 to 5.
The pattern is remarkably consistent. Most teams rate themselves somewhere between 2 and 3. I rarely see 4s, and almost never see 5s.
And these aren't struggling teams. They're talented, experienced product marketers. They have strong frameworks and know April Dunford’s process inside and out. They care deeply about getting it right. But they feel stuck, because positioning is hard.
AI has made it even harder. Categories are saturated, and differentiating your solution is more important than ever. In fact, the ability to create differentiated positioning supported by strong narratives is one of the MOST important skills hiring managers today are looking for.
So if you feel like you or your team haven’t quite “figured out” positioning or that output is less than ideal, you're not alone.
Let me walk you through why it fails and what actually fixes it.
Why product positioning fails
1. Positioning gets created in isolation or diluted by committee.
These are two common patterns – both extremes, and neither is good. In the first, a PMM creates positioning on their own. Stakeholders weigh in randomly or through ad-hoc meetings, but there's no space made for shared conversation. In the second, teams go too far in the other direction – trying to build consensus by incorporating everyone's feedback, and losing the positioning’s edge and clarity in the process (the peanut butter approach). Read about it here.
Both approaches miss something fundamental: positioning is an alignment exercise, not a solo deliverable. The goal isn't to write the perfect statement and get approval. It's to create shared understanding across the people who need to use it.
2. Positioning is treated as a launch deliverable instead of a strategic input.
This often happens when product management doesn’t understand the product marketing function. They see positioning as something that happens at launch: features get built, decisions get locked, and then PMM comes in to explain it all.
This is actually the wrong order of operations. Positioning works best when it informs product development, not follows it. Early positioning creates clarity on what the product does and who it's for. That clarity shapes better decisions. Positioning that comes after decisions are made is reactive: you're explaining features without knowing if they matter to customers.
It evolves in stages:
Discover — before a line of code is written, pressure-test your right to win.
Design — refine value pillars as the product takes shape.
Develop — lock the narrative before launch.
Deploy — activate it across messaging, channels, and sales.
When positioning informs the roadmap early, you build the right thing. When it’s layered on at the end, you’re just trying to explain it.
I break this down in more detail here. Also, see the chart below to represent this.

3. Teams focus only on the positioning statement itself, not what feeds into it or what happens after.
Most positioning conversations stay narrowly focused on crafting the statement – skipping two critical pieces get skipped:
The inputs: What data and insights should actually inform positioning? Some good news: most teams already have the research they need to start.
The activation: How will you translate positioning – first into messaging, and then sales conversations, on product pages, in customer onboarding? Without a clear activation plan, even great positioning sits unused.
These three problems feed into each other. Positioning stays misaligned across teams, sales doesn't use it, Product and PMM aren't aligned, and positioning becomes a box you check off rather than something that shapes business operations and helps you grow.
A strong positioning process – the one I’m about to walk you through – can solve all three at once. It’s not just for writing a statement, but a system for how to make sure it gets used throughout your organization.
Before we dive in, let’s quickly reset on some commonly used but often misunderstood terms:
Positioning, messaging, copy, and narrative
Before we dive into the process, let's get clear on what we're actually talking about.
Positioning is your strategic foundation. It's how your product fits in the market: who it's for, what it does, why it's different, and why it matters. Think of it as the internal logic that guides everything else.
Messaging is how you communicate your positioning. It's the language, themes, and key points (value pillars, benefits, capabilities, and features) you use to convey your value to customers.
Copy is the execution. It's the actual headlines, body text, CTAs, and specific language that shows up on your website, in emails, in ads. Copy brings messaging to life and can be clever, punchy, or creative.
Narrative is the story arc that connects your positioning across touchpoints. It's how you guide customers through understanding your value over time, from first awareness to deep conviction.
You can think of these as layers of the onion with positioning in the middle – and if the center is not right, then everything falls apart, no matter how great your copy is. That’s why it’s so critical to get it right.

My 5-step product positioning process
I've been refining this process for years across companies of different sizes, stages, and industries. It's designed to fix the positioning mistakes we just talked about: create the right amount of alignment, bring PMM in earlier, and give teams a repeatable system.
This is a mixed-method approach, not pulled from a single playbook but instead influenced by some of the strongest positioning frameworks (including April Dunford’s), combined with what I’ve learned from running workshops and leading PMM within organizations. I’ve used it to train dozens of teams and individuals.

Step 1: Gather data and insights
Notice I didn't say "do more research." I said, gather what you already have.
The goal here is to determine the least amount of data needed to come up with the best possible insights to inform positioning. This does NOT necessarily mean conducting more customer interviews, competitive analysis, or market research. Because you probably already have enough insights to move forward. The problem is that no one has synthesized these insights in a way that's useful for positioning. So how do you do this with the least effort?
Start with the end goal in mind
First, get clear on what you're trying to inform. You need to understand:
Market segmentation and ICP
Personas, use cases, and jobs to be done
Differentiated value
Customer proof (if it exists)
Keeping these goals in mind helps you figure out which insights actually matter.
Use the triangulation method
Here's the framework I use: instead of gathering a ton from one source, mix your data types. You’ll get better coverage, reduce bias, and have more usable data.
Think of it as a triangle with three types of data:
Qualitative data (what people say): Customer interviews, call recordings, online reviews. You don't need dozens; just two to three will usually surface 80% of what you need to know.
Outcomes data (what they choose): Customer acquisition cost, NPS, churn rates, conversion rates. These give you directional clues about what's working and what isn't.
Behavioral data (what they do): Usage analytics, feature adoption, onboarding completion rates – how customers actually interact with your product, not just what they say they do or plan to do.
Mixing these types rather than going deep on just one will give you a more accurate picture than 50 interviews alone.
.

Step 2: Conduct the positioning workshop
This is where the magic happens, and it's not a solo exercise.
A positioning workshop brings cross-functional stakeholders into the same room (or Zoom) to speak the same language about the product's value. You absolutely need product in the room; sometimes sales, sometimes customer success. The exact mix and seniority levels needed depends on your org, but the point is: this isn't something PMM does alone and then presents.
The workshop format works because it forces alignment and focus in real time. Instead of endless Slack threads and comment wars in Google Docs, you hash it out together. Disagreements will surface, but you resolve them in the moment.
Product teams start thinking about capabilities and outcomes, not just features. Sales starts understanding the strategic rationale behind the messaging. Everyone leaves speaking the same language.
It builds buy-in without authority. As a PMM, you often don't have formal power over product or sales. But when you facilitate a strong workshop, you demonstrate influence. You become the person who brings clarity to the chaos.
The structure of the workshop matters. I use a set of forcing questions and exercises designed to pull out what people actually know (and reveal what they don't). These are listed below..
1. Start with your happiest customers
Ask: Who gets the most value from us? This is where alignment gaps show up. If there’s no consensus on your best-fit customer, everything downstream breaks.
2. Identify the champion persona
Within the ICP, who actually drives the deal forward –end user? Budget owner? Executive sponsor? Sharp positioning requires a clear champion.
3. Clarify their jobs-to-be-done
What is the champion trying to accomplish? What motivates them? What gets in their way?
4. Define the real alternative
If you didn’t exist, what would they do instead? It might be another vendor, a workaround, or nothing at all. Pick one. Positioning needs a clear reference point.
5. Pressure-test differentiators
What truly sets you apart from that alternative? Some claims will be table stakes. A few will emerge as real competitive strengths.
6. Build the value matrix (post-workshop)
Translate differentiators into impact: Attribute → Capability → Benefit → Business Outcome This connects product details to what the champion actually cares about.
7. Synthesize into a messaging house
Bring it all together: • ICP & champion • Core challenges/jobs • Differentiators & value pillars • Proof & business outcomes
Tools like Miro or FigmaJam boards are best for this kind of exercise, whether in person or virtual, as a way to truly preserve the work you’ve done (see visual below).
Of course, positioning can't just live in your head or be buried in a slide deck. You need to document it in a way that's accessible, reusable, and clear.
That's where the positioning and messaging canvas comes in. It's a structured document that captures not just what you decided, but why you decided it.

Step 3: Capture into a positioning and messaging canvas
The centerpiece of this canvas is the value hierarchy exercise. This is where most teams get stuck, and it's also where the biggest breakthroughs happen.
Here's how it works. You map your product across four layers:
Features: What it is. The tangible pieces of your product. Think: dashboard, API, mobile app.
Capabilities: What it does, and enables users to do. Think: track performance in real time, automate workflows, and centralize data.
Benefits: What it means for the user – capabilities translated into value. Think: save time, reduce errors, increase visibility.
Outcomes: The transformation or business result. Think: grow revenue, improve customer retention, scale operations.
Example Value Matrix of a Fake B2B SaaS AI platform
Features | Capabilities | Benefits (User-Level) | Outcomes (Business-Level) |
AI-powered anomaly detection | Automatically identifies unusual patterns across revenue, usage, and churn signals | Teams don’t need to manually monitor dashboards | Faster issue detection → reduced revenue leakage |
Natural language data queries | Allows anyone to query data in plain English | Non-technical teams can self-serve insights | Increased data adoption across departments |
Predictive forecasting engine | Projects revenue and usage trends based on behavioral patterns | Leaders can anticipate risks and opportunities earlier | More accurate quarterly planning and resource allocation |
Most common teams jump from features straight to benefits, completely skipping the capability layer.
But capabilities are the bridge that connects what your product is to why it matters. Without that bridge, your positioning feels hollow. You're making claims ("save time!") without showing how the product actually delivers on them.
When I have teams fill out a matrix with these four columns during workshops, the capability row is always the hardest and the most revealing. It forces product teams to articulate what the product actually does before they start making promises about what it means.
Once you've mapped the hierarchy, you capture it in the canvas alongside your target audience, competitive differentiation, and proof points. This becomes your source of truth.
Step 4: Test and validate
Before you roll out positioning across the org, you need to pressure test it. This helps during the workshop when stakeholders disagree too much on positioning decisions; you can say, "Look, we're not trying to create perfect positioning here. We have to test this anyway." That speeds up the process instead of three months of back and forth.
Because positioning is a hypothesis. It's what you think is best, but you can’t validate until you see how your audience actually responds to it.
Three ways to test positioning
Below are three practical ways to validate your positioning.
First, direct discussions with customers (especially powerful in B2B). Have salespeople use the new positioning directly in sales deals. See what resonates, what confuses, and what questions customers ask.
Second, panel research. For B2B, Wynter is a tool that's widely used. User testing platforms work well, too. Get direct feedback on whether your positioning is clear to your target audience.
Third, direct channel testing. Test it across your marketing channels. A/B test emails. Try different social copy. Put variations on your website and see what performs. You’re doing this; just apply it to positioning.
The key insight is that testing doesn't happen once before launch. You test, learn, refine, and test again. You can create something, validate it in the market, iterate, and do it again.
This mindset also helps you move faster. When teams get stuck debating positioning details, remind them that the market will tell you what works, which beats endless internal debates. Build the hypothesis, test it, learn from it, and refine – here’s how.
Step 5: Activate and iterate
This is where most teams drop the ball. They create the positioning, share the document, and then… nothing happens. Sales keeps using their old pitch. Product keeps talking about features.
The problem is simple: it’s not obvious to other teams l how to actually use your positioning document.
So you need to create derivative assets for each team.
For marketing, create a quick reference guide for copywriting. What to say, what not to say. Specific phrases. Examples of off-brand language to avoid.
For product, create a strategic insights brief. Share the competitive intel and customer feedback that can inform their roadmap.
For sales, develop the actual talk track. The pitch, the objection handling, and the proof points they can use in customer conversations.
The more directly you answer their questions, the better adoption you get. And when you help them, something powerful happens: they start helping you back.
The teams that treat positioning as locked either stick with outdated messaging or reinvent everything from scratch every six months. Both are painful. Instead, build a rhythm. Make positioning a part of how your organization operates.
How this process brings in PMMs earlier (and earns you a seat at the table)
A strong positioning process doesn't just improve messaging. It changes when and how PMMs get involved in product decisions.
Right now, if you're like most PMMs, you're brought in after product decisions are made. The roadmap is set. Features are locked. Your job is to "make it sound good."
But when you establish positioning as a repeatable process, not a one-time deliverable, it becomes a forcing function. Product teams start to realize they can't ship without clear positioning. And positioning can't happen without PMM.
Here's how to use this as leverage:
Make positioning a requirement, not a nice-to-have. Explain why it’s a critical input to the product development cycle, not an afterthought. When Product proposes a new feature, ask: How will we position this? Who is it for? What value does it deliver?
Show how positioning informs product decisions. Use the value matrix exercise with product teams before features are built. If they have trouble articulating a feature’s capabilities and outcomes, they start questioning whether it's the right thing to build in the first place.
Create a repeatable rhythm. Don't wait for launches to do positioning work. Build it into your quarterly planning. Make it part of how product and marketing operate together.
The positioning workshop itself becomes your leverage. When you facilitate a strong session that brings clarity and alignment, people notice. You become the person who makes the complex simple. You demonstrate strategic thinking, not just execution.
That's how you earn a seat at the table: by proving you belong there through the value you create.
What’s next
If you see yourself and your team in what I’ve described above, you don’t have to fix it alone. Here's how I can help:
1:1 coaching for PMMs looking to elevate their positioning work, influence without authority, and become true strategic partners - not just launch support.
Team training and advising for companies that want to build a great positioning, especially for navigating complex positioning challenges, multi-product portfolios, or major strategic shifts.
Simply contact me if you are interested, and we can discuss how to work together.



